Module 5 - Representivity
Module 5, entitled representivity, reinforces some of the key aspects learnt
in the other modules on how the one participating in the the stakeholder
process can ensure they have a stronger voice (through community leaders, NGO
support etc) and also how the stakeholder
practitioner can ensure that all his/her stakeholders have adequate
representivity (through stakeholder analysis, info sharing etc).
Comments
Module 5 - Representativity
Dear Oriana
I have read through Module 5 and wish to bring some experience from Mauritius that work well in obtaining good representation at discussions, meetings etc.
For discussions that involve fishermen, tour operators and skippers, scheduling the meeting when these stakeholders have lots of work/business or during the day does not reap much attendance. However, doing so after 5/ 6 pm, when these stakeholders have finished with the day's work is best. This may not fit with the work schedule of other stakeholders who may be more on a 9-4 job!
If the meeting is held during the day, when the stakeholders ought to be earning their daily bread, then the best is that the project provides a stipend that covers an expected day's work. Thus, good representativity of groups that do not have a fixed income can be obtained.
I also know that some marginal groups must have their voice heard and are assisted by prominent, respected or trusted community members who become their voice. They represent the views of the community, assuming that the community is not divided over the issue at hand, which is often the case and means that the representative has the difficult task of representing the community.
Caucusing is something that is done at all levels from community groups up to businesses. One may not realise it, but one often goes into a discussion after having discussed the issues in great depth with a wide range of persons.
I also feel that there must be a strong willingness of the SP practitioners to engage the marginal(ised) groups, and to adopt a bottom-up approach. I have witnessed cases where the stakeholder group felt little concerned by the discussion (thus were poorly represented) or felt that their presence was more for formality. Their participation was also weak as their heart was not in the process. I have on the other hand known where such groups were motivated by SP practitioners to make their voices heard, and their stand made clear and concise. When such groups are organised, they earn the ears and respect (and often admiration), of all present.
Finally, I loved the wise words from Madiba!
Regards
Vikash